Friday, 6 September 2013

10 Misconceptions About New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers


1. They like to file frivolous lawsuits.
Wrong. Filing a medical malpractice lawsuit in New York is downright difficult. A lawyer must first conduct a thorough investigation of the facts and then have all the medical records reviewed by a medical expert. Only after the expert has confirmed evidence of wrongdoing; that the wrongdoing caused injury; and that the injury is significant, can the attorney go forward and file suit.
Remember, nobody likes a frivolous lawsuit. It's bad for the lawyer, the client, the doctors, and the Court system. While there may always be differences of opinion about what happened and who is responsible for the victim's injuries, a New York Medical Malpractice lawyer is ethically prohibited from filing a lawsuit that has no merit. Besides, who wants to waste thousands of hours of their time prosecuting a case that has no merit, and spent countless amounts of money to pursue a case that doesn't belong in the Court system?
2. They sue everyone who saw the patient, even if there's no reason.
Most of the time, this is incorrect. A lawyer is ethically bound to sue only those individuals who can be directly linked to the client's injuries. Sometimes, after reading a hospital record it appears as if nurses and health care providers participated in the events that led to the client's injuries. In those cases it may be necessary to name people in the lawsuit that might be peripherally involved.
Once it becomes clear during the course of the lawsuit that certain individuals had nothing to do with the malpractice or causing injury, the patient's lawyer is likely to dismiss that person from the lawsuit- either after they have given testimony or shortly before trial.
3. They get 1/3 to 1/2 of the settlement or verdict as their fee.
Wrong. In New York the fee is less than that. In a medical malpractice case, the lawyer's fee is based on a sliding scale which is set by law. It is less than 1/3. In fact, the lawyer's fee only starts at 30% and decreases as the amount we recover for our client increases. This sliding scale has been in effect in New York since 1985, and benefits the injured client, not the lawyer.
This is how a New York malpractice lawyer calculates his fee:
(1) The expenses that the lawyer has laid out to prosecute your case gets reimbursed to the lawyer from the total settlement amount.
(2) Of the remaining amount, the lawyer's fee is calculated.
If your award is anywhere from $1 to $250,000, the lawyer's fee is only 30% of that amount.
If you are awarded anywhere from $250,001-$500,000, the lawyer's fee on that segment of the award drops now to 25%.
If you are awarded anywhere from $500,001-$750,000, the lawyer's fee for that segment drops again to 20%.
This drop in the attorney's fee continues until you achieve over $1.25 Million. Anything over $1.25 million, the attorney's fee remains at only 10%.
This fee is significantly different than in a case involving a car accident or a trip and fall. In those 'negligence' cases, the lawyer's fee in New York State is 1/3 of your award, after the expenses have been repaid to the law firm.
4. They hate doctors and hospitals.
Wrong. Most malpractice attorneys recognize that most physicians and hospital staff work hard at what they do and appreciate the patients they treat. The problems arise with those few physicians who don't practice medicine in accordance with the standards of their specialty. It's those few bad apples that are careless and cause harm to patients.
Remember, lawyers are people too. They need physicians and hospitals too, and rely on their expertise when they are ill.
5. They are responsible for increases in health care costs and the premiums that doctors pay for their malpractice insurance.
Wrong. There are many studies that have been published by well-educated and well-credentialed folks who have consistently stated that increased premiums for medical malpractice insurance have little to do with the lawyers who file malpractice lawsuits. In fact, I just read an article where Anthony Bonomo, the Chief Executive Officer of PRI - Physicians Reciprocal Insurance Company (one of two major malpractice insurance companies here in New York), confirmed that lawsuits have little to do with the rise in malpractice premiums that doctors must pay for their medical malpractice insurance policies.
Some physicians argue that they practice 'defensive medicine' in order to run tests the patient doesn't really need. They also argue that running all these tests will prevent some lawyer from later claiming that certain tests should have been done to check for medical conditions that were never considered by the doctor.
The problem with this argument is that lawyers don't dictate what treatment patients should get. The physician should be smart enough to know what possible conditions the patient may be suffering from, and order those tests that will either confirm, or rule out those possible medical problems. If the doctor doesn't know enough about the patient's condition, then he should be referring the patient to a specialist, or calling in other doctors to consult about this problem.
If you want to look at why health care costs have increased, one need only look at the compensation that health insurance executives receive and question why they are paid millions of dollars per year.
6. They're looking for a quick settlement to squeeze money from the insurance company.
False. There is no malpractice insurance company in New York that would permit themselves to be taken advantage of. The insurance companies in New York that represent doctors and hospitals hire some of the best and brightest trial lawyers in the state to represent them from the initial stages of a lawsuit all the way through trial and appeals.
Importantly, the insurance company would never allow an attorney to squeeze them for a 'quick settlement'. It simply doesn't happen. In fact, most malpractice cases here in New York are resolved only shortly before or during trial. A lawyer that thinks a malpractice claim will be resolved immediately after filing the lawsuit is naïve, and not experienced with New York malpractice claims.
7. They can settle a case without the client's consent.
Wrong. In New York, the client must consent and agree to any settlement. If the client does not agree to the settlement, then the case continues forward. A lawyer is prohibited ethically and morally from settling a medical malpractice or injury lawsuit without their client's consent.
In fact, when a lawsuit is settled, it is best done in open court, 'on the record', where a record is made of the terms of the settlement. If the settlement is done privately, there are specific legal requirements that must be set forth in the papers confirming the settlement. Otherwise, one party may have difficulty enforcing the settlement.
8. They can settle a case involving an infant if the parent consents to the settlement.
Wrong again. In New York State, any case involving an infant (a child under the age of 18 years) must be supervised and overseen by the trial court. If a settlement is agreed upon by the parties in the lawsuit, the lawyer representing the injured infant must now apply to the trial court for permission to settle that case.
The lawyer is required to explain to the judge why he believes the settlement amount is appropriate and show to the judge medical evidence of the child's injuries and evidence that the injuries are resolved or will get better over time. If the lawyer cannot support the claim that the settlement is appropriate, the trial judge will not approve the settlement, and the case will continue, regardless of the parent's belief that the settlement is a good one.
9. They take any case that walks in the door.
Wrong. It does not benefit a lawyer to accept a medical malpractice case that has little monetary value or little merit. The malpractice lawyer works just as hard on a large case as he does on a small one. The amount of money and time spent to prosecute medical malpractice cases are enormous.
These types of cases are unlike car accident cases or slip and fall cases which are must simpler to prosecute. Lawyers who regularly handle medical malpractice cases here in New York typically reject 98 out of 100 cases that walk in the door. Out of those one or two cases that are accepted for investigation, most are rejected after being reviewed by a physician. This is the screening process that good malpractice lawyers use to evaluate a case.
10. They like to go to trial.
This is often true! A New York medical malpractice lawyer must have sufficient knowledge and experience to go to trial and take a verdict if the insurance company refuses to settle the case. In that instance the lawyer has no alternative but to present his case to a jury so that a panel of impartial folks can determine whether their claims are true. If true, the jury will decide how much to award to the injured victim.
A lawyer who takes a case solely to try and obtain a settlement does the client no justice. The lawyer must be prepared from the outset to go to trial. This is the only way to achieve the best possible result for the injured client. If the insurance company knows that the lawyer is afraid to go to trial, they stand a much better chance of taking advantage of this fact and low-balling the settlement negotiations and staying low.
When a case goes to trial, it means that both sides run the risk of losing. The question always is which side is going to blink first and recognize that settling the case is a better business decision than a jury verdict that could far outstrip what they felt the case was worth.
Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.
Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207
Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com


Financial and Investment Advisor Certifications That Are Widely Recognized


The following certifications are widely recognized within the financial services advisory industry:
* Accredited Estate Planner (AEP)
* Certified Financial Planner (CFP)
* Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)
* Chartered Investment Counselor (CIC)
* Insurance Agents
> Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC)
> Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU)
* Personal Financial Specialist (PFS)
This short list of certifications was constructed using several sources. First, many other certifications require these certifications as a prerequisite. Second, when registering as an adviser with certain states, some of these certifications can substitute for passing various tests administered by the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (NASAA) Third, Form ADV, which is used by the SEC and most states to register advisors, explicitly lists many of these particular designations. Finally, these designations are mentioned more frequently in the financial planning literature and on financial and investment websites.
Accredited Estate Planner (AEP)
The AEP is conferred by the National Association of Estate Planners and Councils (NAEPC). To obtain the AEP an applicant must:
* hold an attorney's license, CPA, CLU, ChFC, CFP, or CTFA
* be professionally engaged in "estate planning activities,"
* have at least five years of directly relevant experience (or 15 years to exempt the educational requirements)
* take certain required courses from the The American College or take two "challenge exams"
> (See the ChFC and CLU listings below for more information on The American College.)
* have membership in an NAEPC council,
* submit references, and
* commit to the NAEPC code of ethics.
Certified Financial Planner (CFP)
The CFP is conferred by the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. (CFPBS). To obtain the CFP designation, a candidate must have either five years of personal financial planning work experience or three years and a bachelors degree. He must pass a comprehensive examination. To take this examination, he must either complete a course of study offered by various educational organizations, or he must already hold a CPA, ChFC, CLU, or CFA designation or a Ph.D. in business or economics, Doctor of Business Administration, or an Attorney's license. The CFPBS has an on-line consumer complaint and practitioner disciplinary process, and it supports on-line professional status checking and referrals.
According to the CFPBS, it is "a nonprofit regulatory organization (that) fosters professional standards in personal financial planning so that the public values, has access to and benefits from competent and ethical financial planning. CFP Board owns the certification marks CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER(TM) and federally registered CFP (with flame logo), which it awards to individuals who successfully complete initial and ongoing certification requirements. CFP Board currently authorizes more than 43,000 individuals to use these marks in the United States." The CFPBS also "establishes and enforces education, examination, experience and ethics requirements for CFP® certificants." (Footnote 1)
Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)
"CFA Institute is composed of more than 70,000 individual voting members and 131 nonvoting member societies that believe in setting a higher standard for the investment profession. Individual members either hold the CFA designation or are active in the investment business and agree to abide by the CFA Institute ethical requirements."
Formerly the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR), the CFA Institute confers the CFA designation. Successful candidates must pass three successive examinations requiring approximately 250 hours of preparation for each examination. A candidate must also have either four years of work experience or an undergraduate degree and three years of work experience.
The CFA Institute manages a professional conduct process including an investor complaint process and investors can enquire about the status of an advisor's CFA credentials.
Chartered Investment Counselor (CIC)
The CIC designation is conferred by the Investment Counsel Association of America, Inc. (ICAA). The ICAA "is a national not-for-profit association whose membership consists exclusively of federally registered investment adviser firms." (Footnote 2) Candidates must have worked for an ICAA member firm and must hold the CFA designation.
Insurance Agents
+ Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC)
+ Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU)
The ChFC and CLU designations are conferred by The American College. To obtain either designation a candidate must complete eight courses and have three years of full-time personal finance or insurance experience. If a person has completed the CLU designation, then he could also obtain the ChFC designation by completing three additional courses. There is no complaint or disciplinary process for either designation.
The American College states that "founded in 1927 as The American College of Life Underwriters, the College has in recent decades broadened its instructional offerings to reflect the growing convergence of insurance and other financial services professions. A variety of designation, certificate, graduate-degree, and continuing education programs now complement its long-respected CLU designation." (Footnote 3)
Personal Financial Specialist (PFS)
The PFS designation is conferred by The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The AICPA established a PFS credential "for CPAs who specialize in personal financial planning." To hold the PFS designation a person must:
* be an AICPA member
* hold a CPA that is issued by a state and is unrevoked
* earn points based upon experience and examination
* submit references and other proof of experience doing personal financial planning work.
Footnotes:
1) Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. (CFPBS) website 2) Investment Counsel Association of America, Inc. (ICAA) website 3) The American College website
Financial ideas bombard you. Some are right, but many are wrong and can be bad for you. With objective, scientific information, I help you to tell the difference and to make better decisions.


Durable Limited Power of Attorney Forms - When to Use


When you would like to allow someone else to have the authority of acting on your behalf, you will have to use a legal document called a power of attorney. It is widely used legal form for any circumstance where there is a need for owner's signatures to make the contract legally binding. When a person signs the power of attorney form, he or she will be granting the legal authority to another individual to be able to stand in the owner's shoes; therefore he/she could act legally for the benefit of owner. In this situation, the person receiving the power of attorney is called attorney-in-fact. Contrary to many people's belief, the person doesn't have to be a lawyer in order to be the recipient.
In many occasions, power of attorney forms are very useful and popular among those who are especially interested in their own asset distribution or inheritance. The forms also can be used to give an authority to someone else to sign particular documents in case you are not able to be present but your signatures are required.
There are few different types of power of attorney forms, such as unlimited power of attorney, limited one and durable unlimited one. Among them there is one called durable limited power of attorney. With this form, you are providing for a limited grant of authority to another individual for very specific reasons. You are designating a person to act for you in a particular occasion, in a very specific manner and you can actually limit the activity that the person will perform. Therefore there are a lot more details described in the document and certainly there will be a limitation.
But this legal form and the contents inside will remain effective even though you become disabled or incapacitated, thus allowing the assigned person to act on your behalf in case of your losing ability. Your attorney-in-fact can keep the authority that is already given through the document and remain valid even if the power is limited. In order for this to be complete, the both parties' names and addresses should be clearly written on the document and signatures are required at the time of signing. Also there should be a full detailed descriptions and outlines of work area described on the document. Usually the owner's signature should be notarized and two other witnesses will be accompanied when the document is complete. In that case, the person who will receive the document is not eligible for being one of the witnesses.
If you are considering of appointing your attorney-in-fact, then you can download Power of Attorney Forms. It is used to protect your own assets and specify legal rights towards your assets after your absence.
For more information about legal documents, go to Free Legal Forms site, where you can find many free legal forms and resources including living trust forms that you can use to help secure your own company and assets.


How to Become a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in New York


There's an old joke that asks "How do you get to Cargenie Hall?" The answer is "Practice."
The same can be said for becoming a medical malpractice lawyer in New York.
My first boss, a well-known trial attorney in New York, told me one day after an exhausting and productive day, that trial lawyers are not born great trial lawyers. Rather, they must practice their trade day in and day out. Only through experience and practice can one become a truly good lawyer.
Becoming a lawyer
In order to become a lawyer in New York, you must attend four years of college. You then must take the LSAT (law school admission test) and apply for admission to law school. Law school is usually a three year program, and once you finish school- you must take the New York State Bar Exam. This is a two day exam that tests your knowledge of general and specific areas of law. Once you pass the bar exam, you must pass an interview with the character and fitness committee in the County in which you live. Once you have passed the interview you will be permitted to practice law in the State of New York.
Gaining experience
Most attorneys will go to work for a law firm to gain experience, and after a few years, move to a different firm. Some will open their own law firms, and some will remain where they started. One of the best ways to gain experience in medical malpractice law in New York is to work in a defense litigation firm that handles medical malpractice defense. There you will learn to handle the file, deal with paperwork, attend court conferences, deal with clients, take depositions, and if you're lucky, assist senior attorneys with trials. In years past, the younger associates at such defense firms could easily count on starting their own trials within one to two years of passing the bar. However, with malpractice cases being so complex, and physicians and insurance companies being weary of the young novice attorney representing such significant matters, it's unlikely that you will be handling your own trial until you are either a partner, or have many years of experience under your belt- even if you are the smartest attorney to come out of your class.
Medical malpractice law
Medical malpractice law is a sub-specialty of tort law- also known as personal injury law. The only way to become good at it is to gain experience by practice and guidance with a senior trial lawyer who handles these cases on a day to day basis. Not only do you need to learn the law specific to medical malpractice issues, but you also have to become somewhat of an expert on the medicine involved in the case.
Learning the medicine occurs by reading medical literature, medical textbooks, speaking with physicians, consulting with your medical experts, and treating doctors. Learning how to apply that knowledge to your case is what takes time and experience. Learning how to cross-examine a doctor at a deposition or question him skillfully at trial is what separates the good attorney from the excellent attorney.
Contrary to what we see on television, the key to being a good trial attorney who handles medical malpractice cases is preparation. Preparation of the medicine, preparation of your records, exhibits, your clients, and your experts; in a word: Preparation. You must know your case better than your own client does. You must educate the Court about your case, the law involved specifically in your case, and must convey your knowledge to the jury in a way that makes your case more believable than your adversary's case.
My own experience
In my daily practice, I truly enjoy handling medical malpractice cases. I enjoy speaking with potential clients who call to see whether they have valid cases that warrant investigating and prosecuting. The hardest part of my job is telling a potential client that I cannot accept their case. When that happens the natural question is "Why can't you take my case?" The answer to that question can be simple or complex depending on the type of case they're calling about.
Being able to help victims of medical malpractice is always rewarding, as many of these victims cannot help themselves and need legal help with rebuilding their lives, their finances and their frail bodies.
For those who call for tort reform, keep in mind that there are many instances of valid malpractice cases here in New York that so few contrarians even wish to discuss. Rather, they want to focus on a few bad apples who bring cases that are questionable. Instead of focusing on a few bad apples, keep your mind focused on what can be done to prevent malpractice from happening, and once it does happen, how to properly and fully compensate the injured victim.
Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.
Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207
Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com


Free Divorce Lawyers


Divorce proceedings are often long drawn out and expensive. To reduce costs, it is beneficial for couples seeking a divorce to know about firms and organizations that offer legal aid for free. People who are not financially sound also look for free legal aid. There are various non-profit organizations in the US that provide free legal advice. They have experienced lawyers and attorneys on their panel who take care of such legal cases for free. Apart from these, some reputed legal firms and attorneys also do some pro bono work as a social service. They take a few legal cases every year without charging the clients anything.
There are plenty of chat shows and live shows on television and radio that focus on legal issues and legal advice. Writing into these with specific problems and queries is a perfect way of obtaining sound and free legal advice. The legal experts called as guests on such shows provide advice and information and help answer the questions posed.
Online divorce is a new concept, yet another innovation to come out of the increasing popularity and use of the Internet. It is a remarkable way that many people utilize to settle their divorce cases in a simple and timely manner.
The pro se waiver divorce is another excellent legal option for couples seeking divorce. It is an almost free legal procedure, wherein for a nominal fee, couples can ensure the services of a legal expert through out the trials. It's a package deal and clients need not pay for each sitting or consultation. This recourse eliminates heavy expenses and time that would have been wasted on attorney fees and court time. Under pro se waiver divorce, a few simple forms and nominal filing and processing fees are all that it takes to dissolve a marriage and start life anew.
Unfortunately, there is a marked difference in the quality of legal support and advice between the attorneys who offer free services and the ones that offer it on an hourly fees basis. In the unfortunate event of a divorce, if the couple can afford it, it is always advisable to consult divorce attorneys who charge a fee and are thereby, more committed to securing their interests.
Divorce Lawyers [http://www.e-DivorceLawyers.com] provides detailed information on Divorce Lawyers, Cheap Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Without A Lawyer, Free Divorce Lawyers and more. Divorce Lawyers is affiliated with Family Law Courts [http://www.WetPluto.com/Divorce-And-Family-Law.html].


Hiring a Good Lawyer for Mesothelioma (Asbestos Cancer) Law Suits


Mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) is the biggest reason why so many people today are hiring lawyers and going after various asbestos companies. Many companies in the past have used asbestos in their products despite the fact that they did know how dangerous asbestos can be to human health. In fact, mesothelioma is also known as asbestos cancer by many people simply because it almost always develops as a result of exposure to asbestos.
If you want to hire a lawyer for mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suits, then you need to be very careful whom to trust. You also have to realize that there is so much more to hiring a lawyer for mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suits than just dialing an 1800 number and signing a contract. Here are some things you should ask yourself:
Do I really have mesothelioma? Some people immediately go to a lawyer for mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suits without first confirming whether they have mesothelioma or not. You should realize that mesothelioma is actually a very difficult illness to diagnose since its symptoms resemble those of a lot of other diseases. This means you have to get a very thorough screening in order to prove that you truly have the illness. Some lawyers for mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suits offer to give you a free screening if they find that you do have a history of exposure to asbestos, so maybe it is a good idea to consult a lawyer first if you have your suspicions.
Is the lawyer experienced enough? The mark of a great lawyer is experience. If you are looking for a lawyer for mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suits then you have to realize the fact that finding an attorney with a lot of experience will be to your advantage. Some people believe that experience can be measured in terms of years, but experience should actually be measured in the number of cases that a lawyer has handled. It is actually quite easy to find out just how much experience a lawyer has, despite the fact that most lawyer will keep trying to evade the question. In fact, simply asking around town regarding who this lawyer is should provide you with a lot of insights regarding just how much experience that attorney has when it comes to asbestos litigations.
Try to ask from former clients to see just how the lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit you are planning to get has handled their cases. With this information, you should be able to take a guess at how the attorney will handle yours.
Class-action vs. self-litigation. There are a lot of people today who are going after companies as a class / group. This means that they are all at once suing a single company for its fault in their cases. Now what are the advantages to this? For one thing, people who join in a class action lawsuit will often find it to be much easier than actually having to appear in court. This is because class action lawsuits are actually handled by the chosen attorneys and will actually only involve you being visited by some lawyers, signing some papers and if the case is won, receiving some money. The problem with a class-action law suit, however, is the fact that the compensation to be given out by the defendant is often given as a block figure to be distributed among the litigators. Your chances of actually being compensated will increase when you get a lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit but the amount that you will get can get smaller.
The advantage of hiring a lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit on your own is the fact that you will be able to present the case by yourself. This means that you will be able to present your case to its full extent. You will also be able to make the company pay you to the fullest extent. However, since you will be litigating alone, the company will also have an easier time fighting your case. Because of the higher risk that you will end up with nothing, a lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit may choose not to defer payments and ask for a retainer up front.
Will the lawyer handle my case personally? There are certain people who get furious when they find out that the lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit they hired is not handling their case personally. Some people may feel betrayed by this information. However, you have to realize the fact that a great lawyer always has subordinates. If a lawyer for a mesothelioma (asbestos cancer) law suit handles your case personally then it is either he/she is not very good or your case is specially rewarding.
For more information on acne please go to:
[http://www.greatmesotheliomalawyer.com/asbestos-cancer-law-lawyer-mesothelioma.html]
[http://www.greatmesotheliomalawyer.com]


Cerebral Palsy, Autism, Multiple Sclerosis - Special Needs Require an Attorney For Estate Planning


Government programs intended to provide benefits to special needs individuals or disabled individuals are useful and help benefit the recipient. Although money and benefits received from Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), or Supplemental Security Income (SSI), does help somewhat, much of the time the amounts paid to the special needs person will not even surpass the poverty income level. What is worse is should this individual receive any modest inheritance of as little as $2,000, government benefits are quite likely to be cancelled or denied to the special needs or disabled person.
There are "tricks of the trade" which can be taken advantage of in order to help assure that benefits continue. Special needs trusts are a boon to families with special needs or disabled children and adults. It is not quite as simple and straight forward as driving to the local office supply store and purchasing a do-it-yourself trust or will kit.
There are a myriad of laws and intricate details which must be taken into account if the parents are to setup the long term-care of a special needs individual properly. Unless one or both of the parents are attorneys experienced in trusts, wills, and inheritance laws, seeking out a qualified lawyer or law firm is the best and most logical solution.
Performing a search on the internet for "special needs attorney" along with the local city name is a good start. Attorneys who advertise practicing in the area of family law can be qualified, however, the lawyer may not be fully aware of the specific needs or limitations of a disabled person. Many attorneys focusing on special needs individuals often have family members of their own who are disabled and therefore are intimately familiar with the ins and outs of the system.
Sufferers of cerebral palsy, autism, multiple sclerosis, or other debilitating disease are often disregarded due to the insufficiency of governmental bureaucracy. Because of this fact, non-profit organizations for disabled citizens can also be of great assistance by providing additional information to families with a special needs family member. Most, if not all of these organizations, have websites for individuals to reference. In fact many people would suggest starting here to quickly learn about taking the best steps forward. Discussion forums found on the internet can be an eye opener as well.
Regardless of the situation or timing, consulting a qualified attorney focusing on special needs family members can only benefit the special needs individual. As long as an attorney has taken the necessary steps, the benefits to the disabled person can be maximized and continue after the parents or spouse has passed away.
Many websites provide additional information on the topic of special needs and estate planning. One such site worth visiting is http://www.specialplanning.net.
Dan Elliott independently author's articles for WebDrafter.com, Inc. ( http://www.webdrafter.com ) for search engine marketing. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those solely of the author, and not of any other person, company, or organization. No guarantee or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding the accuracy, fitness, or use of the content herein.